http://www.sfpulpit.com/2009/01/15/clarifying-calvinism-part-3/
http://www.sfpulpit.com/2009/01/15/clarifying-calvinism-part-4/
http://www.sfpulpit.com/2009/01/16/clarifying-calvinism-part-5/
Friday, January 16, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
Phil makes it real plain. At least he doesn't claim that Arminianism is a "damnable" doctrine! Like some "preachers" who claim that Calvinism is "damnable!"
Post a Comment